Correct answer: B

Main reasoning: Agung is giving an order to the secretary to send the letter. This implies Agung will not deliver it himself; he will cause someone else to do it. The correct causative pattern is “have + object + past participle”: “Agung will have the letter delivered.”

Option analysis:

A. Wrong form after “have the letter ...” because it would need “delivered” for the causative meaning.

B. Correct: “have the letter delivered” means arrange for the letter to be delivered.

C. Incorrect: “have the letter to deliver” does not match the intended meaning.

D. Incorrect and unnatural for this structure.

E. Incorrect: “have the letter delivering” is ungrammatical because the letter cannot deliver something.

Logic note: If Agung gives the order, the secretary does the action; Agung’s direct action is \( \lt \) implied.

Correct answer: A

Main reasoning: “I would if I had been invited” is a conditional sentence showing an unreal past condition. It means: he did not attend because he was not invited. So the fact is he didn’t attend.

Option analysis:

A. Correct: he did not attend (because he was not invited).

B. Incorrect: it refers to the past meeting, not a plan.

C. Incorrect: it implies he did not attend.

D. Incorrect: it implies he would have come, but he didn’t.

E. Incorrect: the condition shows he was not invited.

Logic note: “If I had been invited” is unreal, so the real situation is “not invited”; reality is \( \gt \) the hypothetical.

Correct answer: C

Main reasoning: The situation is happening now (“are becoming thicker and thicker”), and Raissa expresses what the government should be doing as an ongoing action to address the problem. The best fit among the choices is the present continuous: “are educating.”

Option analysis:

A. Simple past suggests the action is finished in the past, not suitable for an ongoing problem.

B. Present perfect is possible in some contexts, but “have educated people” sounds like the education is already completed; the problem is still continuing.

C. Correct: “are educating people” matches an ongoing effort to change habits.

D. Conditional “would” needs a condition; none is given.

E. “Should have” criticizes past failure; the utterance sounds more like a current/ongoing suggestion rather than regret about the past.

Logic note: An ongoing crisis needs ongoing action; ongoing action is \( \gt \) completed past action here.

Correct answer: A

Main reasoning: The structure “helps the sick, the hungry and the ...” requires a plural noun referring to people. “Victims” fits naturally as a group of people who need help. The other options are grammatically or logically unsuitable.

Option analysis:

A. Correct: “the victims” is a natural parallel to “the sick” and “the hungry.”

B. “Accident” is an event, not a group of people.

C. “Screaming” is an action, not a category of people.

D. “Suffering” is a condition, not a group of people (unless “the suffering” is used differently).

E. “Soldiers” can be helped, but the first paragraph is general about humanitarian aid, and “soldiers” is too specific (and appears in the next paragraph).

Logic note: Parallel list items should match in form; people-groups are \( \gt \) events/actions for this blank.

Correct answer: E

Main reasoning: The next sentence says “The organization helps the wounded of all armies.” This directly supports that Henry Dunant saw the suffering of “wounded soldiers.” The word “wounded” also fits the humanitarian context.

Option analysis:

A. “Dead soldiers” cannot be helped in the same way; the focus is care for the living wounded.

B. Similar to A; “killed soldiers” is not consistent with helping the wounded.

C. “Damaged soldiers” is not the natural collocation.

D. “Destroyed soldiers” is incorrect usage.

E. Correct: it matches the following sentence and the Red Cross mission.

Logic note: Direct textual support is \( \gt \) unsupported word choices.

Correct answer: A

Main reasoning: The sentence needs a verb phrase that fits: “... and ___ soldiers and civilians all over the world.” “Cares for” is grammatical and matches the humanitarian mission of the Red Cross. The others are incorrect in meaning or grammar (especially “helps for” and “gives for”).

Option analysis:

A. Correct: “cares for” means looks after/provides care, appropriate for Red Cross work.

B. “Looks for” means searches for, not the intended meaning.

C. “Asks for” means requests, incorrect here.

D. Ungrammatical; we say “helps,” not “helps for.”

E. Ungrammatical; “gives for” does not fit this structure.

Logic note: Correct collocation and grammar are \( \gt \) incorrect preposition use.